Environmental Remediation

Environmental remediation must result in conditions that are protective of human health, safety, and the environment. The number of applicable remediation options for a given project can be twenty or more, depending on contaminant type media affected, and property use and can range from basic removal to long term, high complexity remediation systems. Therefore, a structured approach to alternative selection is required to support effective decision-making based on information available at the time.

When active remediation is necessary, Peak’s Remedial Alternative Selection (RAS) process provides a comprehensive approach to evaluating alternatives and selecting the best remedial option for a given Site. Evaluated options include multiple variations of physical removal and disposal or treatment, in-situ treatment systems, abiotic destruction & in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) injections, aerobic and anaerobic bioremediation amendment injections, and containment technologies, each potentially applicable to soil, groundwater, surface water, sediment, vapor or combinations thereof.

The process considers the effectiveness for contaminants present, client goals, regulatory mandates and restrictions, future use of property, duration and schedule, cost, logistics, accessibility, disruption to operations, and post-remedial requirements. A typical site is evaluated in two steps. Initially, a wide set of remedial alternatives applicable to the type of contaminant and the affected media are screened. Subsequently, potentially applicable alternatives are compared based on a series of detailed evaluation metrics to further reduce the list of best alternatives and rank them.

Metric Task

Costs & Financials Estimate life cycle cost, funding, capital costs, expenses, cash flow

Remedial Objective Success Verify demonstrated effectiveness of alternative

Constructability Confirm logistics and site use, infrastructure proximity

Safety Minimize HSSE risks to team and third parties

Integrity Maximize long-lerm effectiveness/reliability

Typically, the process identifies a short list of less than five primary options that offer best value to achieve goals. Multiple alternatives may be appropriate and can be implemented in parallel or sequence. Detailed cost estimates for the short list and discussion of most important objectives and criteria for the site then leads to final selection.

Related Projects

Peak Promotes Charles Podesta to Project Manager

Charles has been promoted to Project Manager! Charles joined Peak as entry-level Staff Scientist in 2016 and gained experience in conducting multi-media environmental sampling, completing regulatory tasks, and supporting remediation projects including the installation...

Peak Promotes Steven Spreitzer to Project Manager

Steven has been promoted to Project Manager! Steven joined Peak in 2021 as a Project Scientist. Steven graduated from the State University of New York with a major in Geology. He also obtained an MS in Earth and Climate Sciences from the University of Maine. Steven...

Peak Promotes Kristen Castronuovo to Project Scientist

Kristen has been promoted to Project Scientist! Kristen graduated from Rider University in 2020 with a degree in Environmental Science and has been a valuable member of Nova’s Peak Environmental Division since 2021. Kristen has gained experience in Due Diligence...